Skokie Delays Video Gaming Decision Pending Revenue Review
Skokie Delays Decision on Video Gaming Terminals – Village Board Reviews Revenue Potential and Social Impact
Key Takeaways
- Skokie officials will delay any decision on allowing video gaming terminals until at least late 2026.
- Mayor Ann Tennes has asked staff to prepare a detailed report by the end of 2026.
- Nearby suburbs have generated between more than $390,000 and over $1 million in annual revenue from video gaming.
- Illinois law permits up to six terminals per licensed establishment, with wagers capped at $4 per spin.
- Trustees are weighing financial benefits against administrative costs and potential social impacts.
Village Board Postpones Vote Pending Staff Report
Officials in Skokie, a village in Cook County, Illinois, will not move forward with a decision on video gaming terminals before late 2026. During a Committee of the Whole meeting on June 15, Mayor Ann Tennes asked village staff to prepare a comprehensive report on the issue by the end of the year.
Video gaming terminals, often described as electronic slot machines, are currently banned in Skokie bars and other eligible establishments. The upcoming staff report is expected to examine possible revenue streams, administrative oversight requirements, and regulatory frameworks used by neighboring municipalities.
Trustee James Robinson suggested that residents should have an opportunity to weigh in, including the possibility of a referendum. The board’s discussion indicates that any change in policy would follow further public and administrative review rather than immediate legislative action.
Revenue Comparisons with Neighboring Suburbs
A central point in the discussion was potential municipal revenue. Several nearby suburbs have permitted video gaming since Illinois legalized the activity in 2012.
According to figures cited during the meeting, Prospect Heights collected more than $390,000 in 2025. Morton Grove received more than $442,000, Wheeling secured more than $679,000, and Niles reported more than $1 million in revenue.
Skokie officials acknowledged that revenue, if authorized locally, could fall within a similar range. However, they also noted that Chicago’s decision in February to allow video gaming may affect annual collections in north suburban municipalities by increasing competition.
Mayor Tennes stated that a handful of local businesses have told her that video gaming revenue would be essential to their continued operation. Village Manager John Lockerby said Skokie has more than 2,000 licensed businesses, including several hundred restaurants that could potentially qualify to host terminals under state law.
How Illinois Regulates Video Gaming Terminals
Under the Illinois Video Gaming Act, wagers are limited to $4 per spin, with a maximum single payout of $1,199. Licensed establishments are generally limited to six terminals.
The law restricts placement to bars and restaurants that serve liquor, as well as fraternal establishments, veterans’ organizations, and large truck stops. Net terminal income is divided among several parties: 33 percent goes to the state, 29 percent to the terminal operator, 29 percent to the licensed establishment, and 5 percent to the county.
Municipalities may also impose additional controls. Skokie Community Development Director Johanna Nyden said local governments can introduce licensing fees, zoning rules, limits on machine visibility, and screen brightness requirements.
These regulatory levers form part of the board’s current review, as trustees assess how other suburbs have structured local oversight.
Trustees Debate Financial Benefits and Social Costs
Board members raised questions about the broader consequences of introducing video gaming.
Trustee Lissa Levy asked whether there is overwhelming evidence that financial benefits outweigh what she described as significant social ills. She also questioned whether potentially variable revenue could justify costs associated with gambling addiction and related social services, including rehousing individuals whose lives have been severely affected.
Trustee Jim Iverson referred to what he called the moral hazard of gambling but noted that revenue could support the village and local businesses facing economic pressure. Trustee Kimani Levy said more information is needed about lessons learned in other municipalities and the impact on social services.
Trustee Gail Schechter said she would prefer exploring alternative methods to support struggling businesses. The discussion reflects differing priorities within the board, ranging from fiscal considerations to community identity and social impact.
Mayor Tennes framed the issue as a broader question about the character of the community and how video gaming would align with Skokie’s existing environment.
Implications for Local Businesses and Market Participants
For businesses operating in Skokie, the delay means that video gaming will remain unavailable in the near term. Establishments eligible under state law would need municipal approval before installing terminals.
For terminal operators and other market participants, Skokie represents a potentially significant local market given the number of licensed businesses in the village. However, any entry into the market depends on the outcome of the staff report and subsequent board deliberations.
At the same time, Chicago’s recent move to permit video gaming introduces a new competitive factor in the broader regional landscape. Skokie officials have explicitly acknowledged that this development may influence revenue expectations.
Our Assessment
Skokie’s decision to postpone action on video gaming terminals until at least late 2026 reflects a structured review process focused on financial projections, regulatory controls, and social considerations. With neighboring suburbs reporting annual revenues ranging from several hundred thousand dollars to more than $1 million, the financial dimension is clear. However, trustees have indicated that any policy shift will depend on detailed analysis, potential local safeguards, and further public input before the village determines whether to lift its current ban.
We have imposed strict editorial guidelines on ourselves and explain our testing methods openly and comprehensively. We also communicate transparently how our work is financed. This site may contain tracking links, but this does not influence our objective view in any way.
