Swedish Court Upholds AML Fine Against Betsson
Swedish Court Upholds Betsson AML Fine – Ruling Confirms Strict Source of Funds Requirements for Gambling Operators
Key Takeaways
- A Swedish Administrative Court upheld a decision that Betsson committed serious violations of money laundering regulations.
- Spelinspektionen fined Betsson Nordic Ltd SEK 6.5m for insufficient customer due diligence in 2023.
- The court confirmed that operators must take additional steps when withdrawn gambling funds are redeposited.
- Similar penalties against Spooniker Ltd and Snabbare Ltd were also upheld.
Court Confirms Regulator’s Findings Against Betsson
A Swedish Administrative Court has backed the national gambling regulator, Spelinspektionen, in a case concerning anti money laundering compliance by Betsson Nordic Ltd. The court agreed with the regulator’s assessment that the operator committed serious violations of money laundering regulations.
Spelinspektionen first took action in May 2025 against Betsson Nordic Ltd, Spooniker Ltd and Snabbare Ltd. The regulator issued warnings and imposed financial penalties over customer due diligence failures linked to activities in 2023. Betsson Nordic Ltd received a fine of SEK 6.5m.
The case centered on how the operators handled large customer deposits that could not be justified by the individuals’ taxable income. According to the regulator, the companies did not take sufficient steps to establish the origin of the funds.
Regulator Focused on Source of Income and Redeployed Winnings
In its investigations, Spelinspektionen reviewed processes for selected customers. The authority found that the operators failed to adequately identify the source of income for significant deposits.
The companies attributed the funds to previous gambling winnings. However, the regulator stated that these claims could not be accurately verified because the funds had already been withdrawn from the gaming accounts. Once withdrawn, the money was no longer traceable within the operator’s system.
Spelinspektionen argued that operators should have taken further action to confirm whether the money later deposited into gaming accounts was in fact the same money that had previously been withdrawn. According to the regulator, this verification is necessary in a sector considered high risk for money laundering.
The court supported this position. It stated that once the so called closed loop of gambling is broken through withdrawals, operators must take more extensive measures to ensure that returning funds are the same as those originally withdrawn.
Operators Challenged Interpretation of AML Requirements
Betsson contested the regulator’s interpretation of its obligations. The company argued that the requirement to continuously obtain account statements to verify that withdrawn funds were later redeposited goes beyond what is set out in Swedish gaming regulations.
In its objection, Betsson stated that Spelinspektionen’s interpretation was incorrect and inconsistent with previous administrative court practice, preparatory work on money laundering regulations and supranational guidance. The company also described the requirement as disproportionate and argued that it violated principles of equal treatment. Betsson characterized the expectation as impractical and unfeasible.
Spooniker Ltd, which was at the time a subsidiary of FDJ United’s Kindred Group, raised similar concerns. It described the regulator’s risk assessments of selected consumers as imprecise and unsubstantiated, arguing that Spelinspektionen had considered only gross deposits in its analysis.
Despite these objections, the court upheld the regulator’s decisions in all three cases.
Fines and Market Status of the Affected Operators
In addition to Betsson Nordic Ltd’s SEK 6.5m penalty, Spooniker Ltd was fined SEK 10m and Snabbare Ltd, a subsidiary of ComeOn Group, was fined SEK 5.5m. All three companies received formal warnings.
The court confirmed that the operators had not carried out sufficient due diligence to determine the source of funds in the cases examined. It therefore upheld both the warnings and the financial penalties.
Betsson and Snabbare remain active in the Swedish market. Spooniker’s licence expired in October 2025. FDJ continues to operate in Sweden through Unibet Sweden, which holds a licence via Kaprifol Services Limited.
The decision follows another ruling by the same court one month earlier, when it overturned a fine imposed on LeoVegas in March 2025. In that case, the court found that LeoVegas had clearly and distinctly not breached its duty of care obligations under the Swedish Gambling Act.
Implications for AML Controls in Swedish Gambling
The ruling clarifies how Swedish authorities interpret anti money laundering obligations in the context of online gambling. The court emphasized that gambling is regarded as a high risk industry for money laundering purposes. When customers withdraw funds and later redeposit money, operators must ensure that they can verify the origin of those funds with sufficient certainty.
For operators, this means that internal monitoring systems and documentation processes must address situations where the closed loop of gambling transactions is interrupted. Simply attributing deposits to prior winnings is not sufficient if the funds cannot be independently verified once they leave the gaming account.
For you as a user evaluating licensed platforms, the case highlights the regulatory scrutiny applied to source of funds checks and customer due diligence in Sweden. Regulatory expectations may affect how operators request documentation and verify financial information, particularly in cases involving large or unusual deposits.
Our Assessment
The Swedish Administrative Court’s decision confirms Spelinspektionen’s strict interpretation of anti money laundering requirements for licensed gambling operators. By upholding the fines and warnings against Betsson Nordic Ltd, Spooniker Ltd and Snabbare Ltd, the court established that operators must take additional verification steps once customer funds leave and later re enter gaming accounts. The ruling provides regulatory clarity on due diligence standards in the Swedish market and reinforces the high risk classification of gambling under money laundering regulations.
We have imposed strict editorial guidelines on ourselves and explain our testing methods openly and comprehensively. We also communicate transparently how our work is financed. This site may contain tracking links, but this does not influence our objective view in any way.
